5 thoughts on “Is the Liang Li case theft or occupation?”
Lora
Liang Li picked up the gold case, which was filed with "theft" at the beginning. Finally, the procuratorate decided not to prosecute with insufficient evidence. Event playback: ◆ On December 9, 2008 Tramid Liang Li "picks up" a carton with 14 kg of gold jewelry and 3 million yuan in Shenzhen Airport, and is in Take back the residence after get off work. ◆ On the evening of December 9 The Shenzhen police came to Liang Li's house and took the carton together with Liang Li to the police station. ◆ On April 3, 2009 The Baoan District Procuratorate once again returned Liang Li's suspected theft and returned to the public security organs to supplement the investigation. ◆ On May 11 The media disclosed the "Liang Li Picking Gold Case" for the first time, which stirred thousands of waves. ◆ September 13 The prosecution extend the review and prosecution period. ◆ September 10 Liang Li obtained the bail pending trial. ◆ September 25 The prosecutor's review ended that Liang Li believed that the evidence of theft was insufficient.
Liang Li's suspected theft evidence was conclusive. The May 15, 2009 08:11 Zhengzhou Evening News On the 13th, Shenzhen Police held a press conference on the case of "picking up" huge gold jewelry on Shenzhen Airport Cleaning female worker Liang Li, which announced the latest progress. The person in charge of the Shenzhen Municipal Public Security Bureau said that the investigation process of investigating the case was completely legal. Existing evidence has proved that Liang Li has the motivation of illegally possessing the property of others, and also objectively implemented a secret stealing behavior. The public security organs have fully concluded the evidence of the investigation of the case with suspected theft. Arrested.
Nothing, obvious innocence. The theft is aware of it. If occupation is a legally obtaining material or money, but the refusal to return. The parties in this case are not in two points
On December 9, 2008, the cleaner Liang Li cleaned in the waiting room of Shenzhen Airport and "picked up" a small carton, thinking that there were only some decorations with small value, so she brought back home in accordance with the "convention". But in fact they are gold jewelry, worth more than 3 million yuan. Police came to the door, Liang Li took the initiative to return the box, and was detained by criminal detention to this day. The case of the Liang Li case, the police proposed that the procuratorial organs filed a public prosecution. The current case has been in the prosecutor's examination and prosecution. If the media report is true, Liang Li is suspected of embezzlement, not the crime of theft. It my country Criminal Law Article 270 clearly stipulates: "(1) will be illegally occupied by the property and objects that will be kept on behalf of them. Or fines; if the amount is huge or other severe circumstances, it is imprisoned for two years and less than five years, and a fine. (Paragraph 2) illegally occupy the forgotten or buried objects of others. If you do not hand over, punish in accordance with the provisions of the previous paragraph. "Forgotten objects refer to the owner who loses the possession and controlling items due to accidental. The gold in this case obviously belongs to the "forgotten", and Liang Li's behavior fully meets the provisions of the second paragraph of this law. In the crime of theft, the stolen items shall take reasonable control and management measures in a state of possession. The owner's loss of possession of the possession of reasonable control and management measures should be forgotten or abandoned. Others who have forgotten things, cannot be convicted of theft, but can only be convicted. Can't change due to valuable items. This is clearly stipulated in the law, and public, prosecutors, and legal organs should strictly abide by. As for whether Liang Li knows whether it is precious gold when picking up items, it does not affect the qualitative of the case. The social harmfulness of Liang Li's behavior obviously did not have the serious theft. He was sentenced to violation of the crimes stipulated in the criminal procedure law of my country's criminal procedure law with the crime of theft. According to the law, if the theft is determined, the case may be sentenced to life imprisonment.
Liang Li picked up the gold case, which was filed with "theft" at the beginning. Finally, the procuratorate decided not to prosecute with insufficient evidence.
Event playback:
◆ On December 9, 2008
Tramid Liang Li "picks up" a carton with 14 kg of gold jewelry and 3 million yuan in Shenzhen Airport, and is in Take back the residence after get off work.
◆ On the evening of December 9
The Shenzhen police came to Liang Li's house and took the carton together with Liang Li to the police station.
◆ On April 3, 2009
The Baoan District Procuratorate once again returned Liang Li's suspected theft and returned to the public security organs to supplement the investigation.
◆ On May 11
The media disclosed the "Liang Li Picking Gold Case" for the first time, which stirred thousands of waves.
◆ September 13
The prosecution extend the review and prosecution period.
◆ September 10
Liang Li obtained the bail pending trial.
◆ September 25
The prosecutor's review ended that Liang Li believed that the evidence of theft was insufficient.
Liang Li's suspected theft evidence was conclusive.
The May 15, 2009 08:11 Zhengzhou Evening News On the 13th, Shenzhen Police held a press conference on the case of "picking up" huge gold jewelry on Shenzhen Airport Cleaning female worker Liang Li, which announced the latest progress. The person in charge of the Shenzhen Municipal Public Security Bureau said that the investigation process of investigating the case was completely legal. Existing evidence has proved that Liang Li has the motivation of illegally possessing the property of others, and also objectively implemented a secret stealing behavior. The public security organs have fully concluded the evidence of the investigation of the case with suspected theft. Arrested.
Nothing, obvious innocence.
The theft is aware of it.
If occupation is a legally obtaining material or money, but the refusal to return.
The parties in this case are not in two points
It should be the crime of theft. Essence Essence
On December 9, 2008, the cleaner Liang Li cleaned in the waiting room of Shenzhen Airport and "picked up" a small carton, thinking that there were only some decorations with small value, so she brought back home in accordance with the "convention". But in fact they are gold jewelry, worth more than 3 million yuan. Police came to the door, Liang Li took the initiative to return the box, and was detained by criminal detention to this day.
The case of the Liang Li case, the police proposed that the procuratorial organs filed a public prosecution. The current case has been in the prosecutor's examination and prosecution. If the media report is true, Liang Li is suspected of embezzlement, not the crime of theft.
It my country Criminal Law Article 270 clearly stipulates: "(1) will be illegally occupied by the property and objects that will be kept on behalf of them. Or fines; if the amount is huge or other severe circumstances, it is imprisoned for two years and less than five years, and a fine. (Paragraph 2) illegally occupy the forgotten or buried objects of others. If you do not hand over, punish in accordance with the provisions of the previous paragraph. "Forgotten objects refer to the owner who loses the possession and controlling items due to accidental. The gold in this case obviously belongs to the "forgotten", and Liang Li's behavior fully meets the provisions of the second paragraph of this law. In the crime of theft, the stolen items shall take reasonable control and management measures in a state of possession. The owner's loss of possession of the possession of reasonable control and management measures should be forgotten or abandoned. Others who have forgotten things, cannot be convicted of theft, but can only be convicted. Can't change due to valuable items. This is clearly stipulated in the law, and public, prosecutors, and legal organs should strictly abide by. As for whether Liang Li knows whether it is precious gold when picking up items, it does not affect the qualitative of the case. The social harmfulness of Liang Li's behavior obviously did not have the serious theft. He was sentenced to violation of the crimes stipulated in the criminal procedure law of my country's criminal procedure law with the crime of theft. According to the law, if the theft is determined, the case may be sentenced to life imprisonment.